Thursday 5 May 2011

Not a great night for Labour

If early results prove to be representative of the national trend then tonight may not be as good for Labour as their spokespeople will suggest later today.

Of course it is good that votes have moved from the Lib Dems to Labour. This will come as no surprise whatsoever and should be welcomed. However, Labour’s failure to take control of Holyrood is devastating news and undoubtedly will demand the resignation of the leader of the Scottish labour Party.

In Wales, early signs are that Labour has done well and seems set for overall control of the Principality. Good news for Labour, but even here there has not been a huge swing and it remains touch and go as to whether an overall majority takes place.

In England the Tory vote seems to have largely held, although their Lib Dem partners are taking a severe bruising at the polls. Predictions indicate that if the English results were extrapolated into a General Election result it would mean Labour would have 340 seats (and an overall majority), Conservatives with 264 and the Lib Dems on 21.

All this indicates how Labour are failing to get their argument across effectively. Undoubtedly Lib Dem voters have switched, but most of these tend to be progressives and their discontent was already widely known. Tory voters on the other hand have remained faithful to their party and, in large part their vote has held.

In other words, Labour will need to do far more to convince Tory voters to switch to them when the General Election is called.

I have long argued that the Labour front bench need to up their game and Miliband must be more proactive in attacking Cameron at PMQs. Their rather wimpish style has proven to be ineffective and the vote today will be taken by the Tories as an affirmation that the majority remain content with the way the Tories are handling the economy.

As much as I hate admitting it, they are right. Labour has done too little to bring about a change of hearts and minds. Over the coming months they will need to do far more to bring Tory voters into the fold and guarantee a Labour victory. In particular, they will need to show Tory voters that Labour has an effective economic strategy that can address the deficit and that the party is capable of stabilising the economy and attract new industries and new business to this country.

In other words, before Labour start popping the champagne corks they need to look long and hard at the figures – if they are honest they will admit yesterday’s election has shown there is still a great deal more to do.

6 comments:

  1. Labour popping the champagne corks...

    A champagne socialist is a derogatory label for a person who vocally and ideologically expresses support for democratic or radical socialist beliefs, but lives a lifestyle that contradicts these values.

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Champagne%20Socialist

    ReplyDelete
  2. What economic strategy do you think Labour should use now? should they continue with Benito Mussolini's third way?

    'In economics, fascism was seen as a third way between laissez-faire capitalism and communism'

    http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc1/Fascism.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. I dispair - I think if the general population knew how politics works in more detail and could see past all the spin the Tories would have far less power and labour as well (but to a lesser extent). I want to help and do something that will have a real effect in making the country a fairer and better place but i cant think of anything that will really work and hasn't already been tried? Is there anything that could work that hasn't been tried already?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ummm .. could I just point out that the Blairist Third Way was actually based on the theories of Anthony Giddens and not Mussolini. Not much of a difference - just 60 years or so :-)

    And regarding your comment about "champagne socialism" ... your point is?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Tim,
    I think you probably speak for a large proportion ov oters who have been depoliticised over the last few years. Oratory is in decline and this parliament is arguably full of the least charismatic bunch for a generation.

    Despite the conclusions of the AV vote yesterday you could consider working for further electoral reform. I would argue one of the reasons voters voted against AV is because it is arguably one of the worst PR options available. Had the public been allowed to consider STV, we may have had a very different result today.

    Alternatively, you could consider involvement in a broad array of pressure groups - CND/ Stop the War, anti-cuts groups, anti-racist/ anti-fascist groups etc etc.

    The main thing to remember is that there are numerous options - you just have to find one that suits you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Diogenes - not only did I delete your earlier comment for breaching site rules, but I also withdrew your last one as well for the same rule. As you will see from the header I welcome contributions from all political persuasions, however I will not tolerate rudeness and discourtesy.

    Everyone else contributing to this blog has been happy to adhere to those rules and it has resulted in some lively and robust debates. It would seem you were unwilling/ unable to go along with the rules and so therefore paid the consequence.

    ReplyDelete

Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics